When Dr. Gordon Waddell first developed these signs in the 1980s, physicians used them to detect malingering patients, especially those trying to fake injuries for workers’ compensation benefits. However, physicians today widely recognize that this brief examination serves simply as a preliminary step to help identify patients whose conditions may require a more detailed assessment.
Some employers misunderstand Waddell’s signs, thinking they are tests physicians can use to detect workers’ compensation fraud among employees with all types of injuries. In fact, Waddell developed these signs to apply exclusively to lower back injuries and did not intend for the five signs to be completely indicative of malingering. As an employer, it is important for you to understand how physicians use Waddell’s signs and why the presence of any of the signs may—or may not—indicate workers’ compensation fraud or impact the employee’s ability to return to work successfully.
In short, a high Waddell score—meaning the presence of three or more of the signs explained above—indicates possible symptom magnification or illness behavior. One or two signs presented generally do not indicate
non-organic symptoms, though if you are truly concerned, you could require the employee to go in for more conclusive, concrete tests.
Several researchers across medical disciplines have found that non-organic signs and positive Waddell tests occur more frequently in lower back pain patients who are anticipating or are already receiving financial compensation during the injury.
Also, there is a connection between Waddell’s signs and the ability—or desire—of employees to return to work. Several physicians have recently studied the impact of Waddell’s signs on the workplace. In one study, at least one non-organic sign was present in 47% of patients whose work status did not improve. Comparatively, a non-organic sign was only found in 12% of patients who demonstrated significant improvement. Another study found that of patients with non-organic symptoms whose physicians give a vague diagnosis or a nebulous treatment plan, less than 40% return to work.
The bottom line is that it is crucial for employers to communicate their intentions and efforts to physicians so they understand the importance of the employee returning to work. Rather than trying to nail employees for workers’ compensation fraud using Waddell’s test, which may not indicate malignancy in many cases, funnel your efforts into a solid, comprehensive return-to-work program. Studies around Waddell’s test all indicate that the most important factor in avoiding fraud and getting employees healthy is requiring and enforcing the return to work duties. Letting employees know that being injured is not a free ride is vital to your company’s cost-containment strategy.
If you need assistance in creating or updating your return to work program, contact us at 423.292.4142 today. Veritas Risk Management & Insurance Services can ensure your employees stay healthy and that injured workers get back on track as quickly as possible.